HiPOx Advantages - APT Water

Advantages

More Details on How HiPOx is Unique

Superior ozone utilization/High mass transfer
- Lower Applied Ozone Dose
- Less Power Consumption
- Less Oxygen Usage
Superior Mixing
- Maximize reaction efficiency
- Faster reaction
- Smaller footprint
Patented bromate control to near non-detect concentrations
Advanced on-the-fly treatment tuning for changing contaminant demand for lower operating cost
Pre-packaged, pre-assembled systems
- Lower installation costs

AOP Comparison of HiPOx vs. UV/H₂O₂

Typical Factors

Hydrogen peroxide utilization is poor for UV/H₂O₂ since only 10-15% of hydrogen peroxide is utilized = Higher hydrogen peroxide costs and higher quenching costs
UV lamp replacement and sleeve cleaning increases maintenance costs and downtime relative to ozone systems
Power requirements for UV in AOP mode are 3 -6 times higher than UV in disinfection mode

HiPOx (O3/H2O2)	UV/H2O2
• UVT – not a factor, means HiPOx can be used as either pre-treatment or post-treatment • Typically lower hydrogen peroxide dose (2.5-5 mg/l for MF effluent) • Hydrogen peroxide utilization of 75-100% • Ozone generally recognized as superior oxidant to UV for many trace organics • Ozone and OH very effective at virus removal (no coliform in membrane treated effluent) • Bromate formation may be controlled with HiPOx or bromate removed by RO	• Very sensitive to UVT, determines power consumption • Typically higher hydrogen peroxide dose (5-10 mg/l for MF Effluent) • Hydrogen peroxide utilization of 10-15%, increases quenching costs or chlorine demand • UV Dose in AOP mode is 3 – 6 times greater than UV Dose in disinfection mode • No bromate formation • Has mercury in bulbs which requires special handling to avoid contamination

HiPOx (O3/H2O2)

UV/H2O2

• UVT – not a factor, means HiPOx can be used as either pre-treatment or post-treatment

• Typically lower hydrogen peroxide dose (2.5-5 mg/l for MF effluent)

• Hydrogen peroxide utilization of 75-100%

• Ozone generally recognized as superior oxidant to UV for many trace organics

• Ozone and OH very effective at virus removal (no coliform in membrane treated effluent)

• Bromate formation may be controlled with HiPOx or bromate removed by RO

• Very sensitive to UVT, determines power consumption

• Typically higher hydrogen peroxide dose (5-10 mg/l for MF Effluent)

• Hydrogen peroxide utilization of 10-15%, increases quenching costs or chlorine demand

• UV Dose in AOP mode is 3 – 6 times greater than UV Dose in disinfection mode

• No bromate formation

• Has mercury in bulbs which requires special handling to avoid contamination